What it takes to be a full stack developer.
What it takes to be a full stack developer.
Those of you that have read my education blogs will have picked up my disdain for the classroom system. My claim is that online working can "increase your education productivity by 5 times". Failure at Mathematics is arely the ability of the student but usually the inability to handle the classroom system. It may seem a crazy claim, that can't easily be measured, but let me prove it by illustration.
A typical student attending a typical classroom lecture at a typical brick and mortar institution is thrown each morning into a multitasking nightme. Find your way to class - argue about you seat - deal with the ADD kid in the seat next to you - watch the lecturer make announcements - write down an equation - cockblock the dreamy kid looking at you two rows down - listen to an inane question from some dumbass - write down another equation - listen to an unintelligible esoteric question from some boy genious - more from the ADD Kid- another equation - focus on holding in a pee - more home work announcements - check your cell phone messages for announcements on the next science lecture - another equation - rush to the toilet. The hyper busy environment of the classroom regime, occurs because it it a sausage factory trying to balance the needs of the teachers with the needs of the students. It is a mess.
OK so what is so bad about Multitasking? You have all heard mum brag about her multi tasking skills. Some of the most busy people at work seem to be those that are best at multitasking?
MULTI TASKING SUCKS.
You are much more efficient if you shut everything else out focus on the issue at hand. I am going to prove it to you:
Consider the multi tasking probelm of write down three symbols and increment them like this:
Arabic numeral Alphabet Roman numeral
1 A I
then write the next row
2 B II
3 C III
4 D IV
5 E V
6 F VI
10 J X
Thats Multi Tasking. Now put away Multi tasking and focus on one column at a time
Can you see (even before taking on Roman Numerals) that the Column approach is much easier? The one that uses focus? We should stop calling it multi-tasking, and call it “switch-tasking.” It is 5 time less efficient when it comes to measuring up classroom against managed online learning.
That is why multi taskng is only an illusion of productivity and why the classroom system sucks.
We are often reminded that South Africns are on the bottom rungs of world maths education, by some estimates beating only Yemen. This does not tell the whole story.
Rounding out the numbers, around 1.6 % of South African learners get a distinction for Grade 12 Maths (8 000 out of 500 000). This compared to UK GCSE where 3% of learners get a distinction. However our NSC Grade 12 Maths exam is a level more difficult than GCSE including areas of financial maths, statistics and calculus.
What is interesting is that when you examine Private Schools in South Africa, the distinction rate jumps closer to 20% at top schools. Far from producing the worst results, South African private schools produce closer to the best maths results in the world. The result is that 15% of top University entrants come from IEB schools. Maths distinction graduates are nearly fully employed whereas the national average of young unemployed is over 50%.
The limiting factor is the quality of teachers and the access to technology. Quality teachers are hard to come by and will always be a limiting factor. However an opportunity awaits us. Adopting technology should be a priority. Machines simply make better maths teachers. We have the opportunity that in more developed countries the maths teachers unions are more militant and resist replacing human teachers with machines. Ironically the second worst country in the world is best placed to do this. Small studies are already showing that access to broadband video and deep learning techniques can raise the distinction rate dramatically. Machines are tireless and almost unlimited in productivity. A determined roll out of maths teaching technology can raise our distinction rate ten fold.
That is why at the Copeman Academy we put our emphasis on Creative Commons and AI Pattern recognition. So far so good. We have a 100% distinction success rate.
Consider that the Land Issue may never be solved.
Land is simply a proxy for wealth and when we say people are dispossessed of Land, what we really mean is they are dispossessed of wealth.
When we mean - give Land - what we really mean is - give wealth - to those that do not have enough. The problem with the concept is that in order to do that, you have to take it away from someone else first. Few people feel that they have too much wealth and would like it all taken away, to release the burden of owning wealth.
Thorstein Veblen dealt extensively with this problem 100 years ago. While Marx predicted the demise of capitalism, Veblen predicted that the masses would emulate the ruling classes. Unlimited wants with limited resources is the fundamental problem of economics and no amount of indignity, self justification or unsupported aggression can solve it.
The consumer surplus is one of the most beautiful things in market capitalism, something that is shared by all of us. Yes rich people get more of it than poor people, so it is shared unequally, but it is there for every one to take.
If you understand that prices are determined by supply and demand in markets and the marginal principle determines the final price, the consumer surplus is the integral of the demand curve from zero to the amount supplied less the market price of that demand. (The blue area in the diagram)
For example as a rich person I would be prepared to pay $10 for a price of bread if that was the price. The market price is actually $6. Then the consumer surplus for me is $4. I am getting a bargain on bread because I am paying $4 less than I would have paid – I would have been prepared to pay $10.
Like I said one of the most beautiful things in market capitalism – we all benefit.
South African ranks in the highest for economic inequality (Gini 0.67) and in the lowest for mathematics and science education (WEF 137). But there's the rub …
South African society is ruthless. While our system consigns the masses to a future mired in misery and poverty, our 1% are destined for greatness. If you lie awake at night worrying about egalitarian equality for all African children, don't read any further ...
While much economic analysis has been done on the poverty of Nations by looking at the 99% and the Analysis of the Gini coefficient, we should suppress the urge to fit a function to the Lorenz curve and then integrate that function. I do it anyway (simple non linear regression on a published dataset) - in South Africa I estimate the Lorentz curve for Grade 12 Mathematics outcomes to be y = 30 + exp(x ^ 2.7/59000) – see graph.
At the Copeman Academy we focus on the 1% and there you get a completely different picture. When we pit our top 1% of students against the 1% of the leading Maths nations. (Singapore, Finland) You find that our 1% leads them not follows them!
The bottom line is that students willing to leave the 20th century “teacher focused” methodology and move to a tech focused AI technology have the advantage, no matter what country they are in. The best maths teaching countries are still geared to produce mediocrity - in buckets!
How does this happen?
Top performing Maths countries with a higher level of Maths education and a lower Gini coefficient of inequality may produce an overall level of Maths and Science, but their use of “better teachers” actually works against them in the 1%. The top students get lumped in for longer with the 99%. In South Africa because our Government Education is so low, the 1% are forced to leave the grid early. They actually end up ahead of the students in the developed countries that stick to the grid.
Essentially because those institutions in South Africa teaching Maths and Science to the 1% are independent of the failing Government system. Here at the Copeman Academy we take no Government funding and are not beholden to bind with the 99% attached to the grid in a lifetime of mathematical poverty.
The unexpected outcome is that those students in developed countries construed to be more successful (better teachers) have their 1% dragged down to the level of their 99%. Whatever time you spend in the system for the 99% (whatever country) is essentially wasted. In South Africa we spent 92% of our education budget on teachers salaries and 8% on infrastructure and technology. At the Copeman Academy we spend 90% of our budget on technology and 10% on teachers salaries. Because technology is the most important component of Maths education. Those that break with the Grid and focus on technology based outcomes actually exceed the outcomes achieved by the 1% in the more egalitarian societies.
This leads to a dark scenario for the 99% and a bright one for the 1% who make the jump. Like I said, we are a ruthless society.
Further Reading Links
E101Economics : Land
To illustrate where Land turns to Capital and Entrepreneurs we should to discuss the Diamond business.
Diamonds go back 2 Billion years.
What gets squirted out in the Kimberly Pipe is a molten belch. Current Geo Economic theory says that there are probably diamonds the size of cars driving around in the mantle that could take a wrong turn and pop out at any moment. Not Nature, Australopithecus, Homo erectus, The Khoisan's, The Dutch, The Griquas, The Basters, The Afrikaners or The German and British Settlers were able to commercialize this resource. For 2 Billion Years less 140, no one turns the idea into money until a brilliant strategist, Cecil John Rhodes comes up with the idea that he is going to control the flow of Diamonds onto the market and take Millions of Dollars off the Jews and Homosexuals, years in advance of him actually taking the stones out of the ground!
The money does not comes from Africa, Africans, African traders, African workers, Settler greed, Rhodes or the Oppenheimers. The money comes from the Ghettos of Europe via the Merchant Bankers of the USA.
Generations of Griquas had stepped over the shiny stones until, in 1866, Schalk van Niekerk purchased the Eureka Diamond from the Erasmus family. Opportunists piled into New Rush grabbing at the alluvial deposits, levelling Colesburg Kopie shovelling out the ever deeper sand. By the time their overcrowded, waterlogged claims hit blue-stone, the diamond industry was in turmoil.
In nineteenth century Europe, Jews are not welcome at the Club and homosexuality is a jail-able pffense.
Rhodes has to sell the idea that diamonds have lasting value. He is faced with the immediate record that under the Afrikaners and Settlers (Kimberley's 1880 version of white monopoly capital) , the Diamond Business has the attention span of a two year old. Under their watch, the DeBeers brothers sell DuToitspan for £8,000 and by 1875 most diamond traders are bankrupt. The stressed out participants left are seeking to get out. Swimming against the tide of popular opinion, Rhodes is able to raise enough capital in Europe to buy out the bit players and make De Beers the first really important public Company in Africa.
Using the charm and showmanship of a nineteenth century Larry Page and Elton John, Rhodes becomes the richest man in the world in a little over five years. The Jews and the Homosexuals believe him, The Jewish Homosexuals bankroll him and the Anti Semites and homophobics are gobsmacked. The Afrikaners become Cattle farmers, The Settlers moved off to Joburg in search of Gold and the Sothos show little interest in Diamond mining beyond getting together enough savings to buy a rifle and head for the rurals.
Rhodes is the ultimate outsider. Reviled for his sexuality, he turns to other victims of predjudice and they build an Empire with little more than tenacity and perseverance. How you get from Rhodes juggling sausages in 1875 to pulling down his statue in 2015, parallels the modern political history of South Africa
Modern brick and mortor Universities that dominate today's tertiary education tend to move slower than events around them. This is not to say that there are not great places offering great opportunities to great futures. There are. However, the very term "Ivy League" conjures up social images of balmy afternoons spent languishing on the lawns of campus in the company of students from a wide cross section of disciplines. The Business Student should be cautioned against the pitfalls that exist in such a world.
Modern Universities with the campus community, social architecture and "all round education" offered, tend to have been built in the 20th century, or are run by academics trained in the 20th century. That means that when they were formed the Internet did not exist. The knowledge economy as we know it was theoretical and open source was not a mainstream culture. Where there is no such thing as free lunch you find closed access journals publishing obscure psuedo-mathematical digests, lecturers earning royalties from copyright texts and a financial system of stipends, put in place to lock any prospective graduate into a prohibitive debt cycle. Students following this path are likely to spend the majority of their twenties mired in debt and their thirties placed in the grey world of the working 90%, with an outside chance of ascending in their forties to the 10%. In this world the worst lack all conviction are the best are full of passionate intensity.
We have not seen a world as unequal as ours since 1913. 100 years ago the outcome was disastrous. Some say the War is imminent. Some say the War has already begun. Its a new War fought between the 1%, where the 99% are irrelevant to the outcome and rather than marched to the front - they face a far worse fate- they are ignored and sent to watch football. The War will not wait for you. Dorothy, if you spend your twenties skating around in the twentieth century, do not be surprised what when you wake up you find that Kansas has gone bye bye and you are watching from the sidelines in the cheap seats.
In a constant state of denial, most Universities are more interested in preserving the known traditions, preserving the employment status of their staff and providing safe pathways for the young minds entrusted to them. Business students are particularly susceptible to the dangers associated with this approach. The Rollerball economy tells us that the safe paths lead to the football stadium and that the vast majority of people will be excluded from labor in the near future. Only a very few (Performers, Capital Managers and Capitalists) will be disruptors. The rest will live in shallows and misery.
To their credit Universities have tried rapidly to adjust to the new world. Online facilities are available and use of open source is encouraged. Yet no matter how hard they try, Universities are run by bureaucrats. The regulations set up by the Education Departments that oversee tertiary education add an evaluative layer of red tape that ties down real innovation. In a world where courses take upwards of three years to approve from concept to delivery, Universities, no matter how they try are by definition as much as 5 years out of date. 5 years ago, Uber did not exist. ISIS did not exists, Newspapers still had a future and Reality TV Stars did not win elections.
To the Business student, the future is particularly important, even if that is a future that holds a gripping darkness for 99% of the people!
Modern Universities are notoriously retrospective. The 1 to 60 Lecture in which a "Font of Wisdom" Professor repeats the same lecture year after year to a less and less relevant audience can no longer compete with The MOOC, which uses the Internet Delivery of the state of the art production of the topic under consideration. Combined with the input of peers from multiple countries and cultures, the MOOC (Mass Open Online Course) provides not only a competitive alternative,but a superior alternative. A first class graduate from a well designed MOOC will outperform all comers in the knowledge economy. This lean, mean apparatus does not suit the bloated administrations.
If that is not enough here comes the grimy underbelly. In most multi discipline Universities and Colleges, the Business Students are usually the majority and they subsidize the more specialized courses! In a financial model that no longer works, Universities have begun to cannibalize themselves. Business careers, the only outcomes that can lead to a lucrative future, sacrifice quality to pay for their neighbors to pretend that they are studying for careers that will create return. Now this may have worked for prospective Capitalists in the 20th century, where we subsidized the poor people who would spend the rest of their lives working for us. In the Rollerball Economy Labor loses value for all but the few performers. The current system has already begun to breakdown and the anger is palpable. Riots plague the less privilege and the privileged blanket themselves in a fee structure that is designed more to induce the illusion of financial advantage than to address the pressing problems of Post Capitalism
To their credit, many Universities have begun bargaining with the Rollerball Economy. They are using "blended learning" as a supplement to their brick and mortor activities, but however well intention-ed, their online efforts are, they are trapped in the old model. Carrying the old fashioned debt heavy package may work for the staff , but consigns the graduates to the underclass. The sclerotic Government supported, debt packaged offering is no longer financially justifiable and as this reality sets in depression is inevitable.
The MOOC brings the opportunity of free education. It also brings new challenges. The MOOC replaces the Font-of-Wisdom with the worlds-best-presenter and replaces the clock work system of industrial organization design with an open online collaboration that never sleeps. The world of business and learning blend naturally and the new 1% begin to emerge.
Please, subscribe to get an access.